Hey there, kids, welcome to the Phile for a Wednesday. How are you? I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: some people just don’t deserve to be parents. Like this Mulberry woman who was accused of murdering her 2-month-old boy. According to authorities, Nancy Williams was arrested after admitting to purposely jamming a wet wipe down her infant’s throat, which fatally cut off the infant’s airway. Crawford County Jail records state Williams is now facing a first-degree murder charge after first responders and police found the 2-month-old child unresponsive. First Responders and Mulberry Police had responded to a call about an unresponsive child. Medics quickly attempted CPR several times and “swept” his mouth but didn’t find any foreign objects inside. Upon further inspection, they realized there was something lodged in the infant’s throat. Emergency personnel had managed to remove the object, which was confirmed to be a baby wipe. They were unfortunately not able to save the child’s life. Court records state the Mulberry woman confessed, telling investigators that the baby was heavily screaming and wouldn’t stop crying. She allegedly didn’t want to wake her husband up, so she forced a bottle into the child’s mouth, cutting his gums. This caused the baby to scream more, and she “wanted him to stop.” Mulberry police noted Williams demonstrated how she cut the infant’s mouth before pushing the wipe hard with her fingers to make the crying and stop the child’s gums from bleeding. She stated that when she lost sight of the wipe inside the child’s throat, she attempted to get it out. That’s when she panicked and woke up her husband, saying the baby was not breathing. When asked why she did not tell anyone about the baby wipe, the insensitive mother replied, “she had other things on her mind.” Obviously the woman was arrested and is being held in the Crawford County Detention Center on a $1 million bond.
COVID-19 has no doubt taken how life changes within a specific amount of time to the next level. I personally am in a more different point in my life than I was even a few months ago. And everyone has had to make adjustments more quickly than usual, seizing opportunities where they can to stay afloat. Well, for Chef Barney Corrigan, it was never about how he could benefit from his idea, but about how he could serve his community. And now, it could possibly turn into something beneficial for himself. Corrigan is a catering chef who lost his job due to the coronavirus pandemic. Thankfully, his wife’s job was still secure, but he saw how his community in Westville, New Jersey, was severely impacted by the coronavirus spread. Some of the people around him who had lost their jobs didn’t know where their next meals were coming from, especially since they also had to worry about their own bills. So instead of moping about how he didn’t have a job, the caterer decided to create a small food pantry. And he had no idea how big the turnout would be. The New Jersey man started with a small wooden cabinet on his front lawn, filling it with dried goods giving people a chance to stop by and grab what they need without feeling embarrassed. Corrigan told CNN, “When I heard car doors outside my house at three in the morning, that made me smile.” But after asking a few close friends to donate, word got around on social media about Corrigan’s free food pantry, and soon, he had to transfer the operation to his garage. Every other Saturday since April 2020, Corrigan has opened up his garage, providing for at least eight families with weekly groceries and much more for new ones who come in. Calling it Barney’s Place Food Pantry, along with hundreds of donations later, both monetary donations and necessity donations, the work chef has been able to serve at least 60 people biweekly over the past five months. Corrigan’s food pantry is different from most food pantries as well. Since most food pantries give out pre-made boxes of groceries, Corrigan’s pantry is special because it’s “set up like a convenience store, so people can come and pick up whatever they need... and whatever they want. Thanks to the generosity of his community and strangers on the Internet, who donate nonperishable items or money, he stocks fresh fruits and vegetables, milk, butter, and eggs.” And Corrigan isn’t just helping efforts against the widespread food insecurity. He’s also helped the morale of the community, bonding with his regulars to encourage them that they’re not alone during these times. Even though new people are always coming through, many of the visitors not only grab what they need, but they stay to spend time together at the newly popular spot. Jim Gavi, a regular at Barney’s Place Food Pantry who has been struggling to find work, explained, “Just talking with him was sort of like therapy. When someone is more concerned about the well-being of others, it sheds that light needed on the darker days of those in need and gives them hope that everything will truly be all right, and we will all get through this difficult time.” And Corrigan stated, “The folks that are coming here have become like family now.” And now that Corrigan has been serving the community after the loss of his own job, this could potentially turn into something bigger than that. Starting a non-profit, he’s hoping to expand from his garage into a warehouse, saying, “I would love to make this a full-time thing. I love to cook so the goal is to eventually serve hot meals in addition to pantry items to anyone in need.” What a way to turn something good into an opportunity for everyone in involved.
An anti-immigrant Norwegian lawmaker said Wednesday that he has nominated U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in the Middle East. Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian parliament for the populist Progress Party, said Trump should be considered because of his work “for a peace agreement between the United Arab Emirates and Israel which opens up for possible peace in the Middle East.” Israel and the United Arab Emirates agreed last month to a historic deal normalizing relations and are scheduled to sign it at the White House on September 15th. “No matter how Trump acts at home and what he says at press conferences, he has absolutely a chance at getting the Nobel Peace Prize,” Tybring-Gjedde, told the Associated Press. He said he nominated Trump today for the 2021 prize, adding that “Donald Trump meets the criteria.” Nominations must be sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee by February 1st, meaning the deadline to nominate people for this year’s peace prize has passed. Tybring-Gjedde was one of two Norwegian lawmakers who nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018 for efforts to bring reconciliation between North and South Korea. Any lawmaker serving in a national legislature can nominate someone for the Nobel Peace Prize. Former U.S. President Barack Obama was awarded the prize in 2009 only months into his first term, a move many felt was premature. The Norwegian committee said it honored Obama for his commitment to “seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” Last year, Trump predicted he would win the Nobel Prize “for a lot of things if they gave it out fairly, which they don’t.” The Norwegian Nobel Committee doesn’t publicly comment on nominees. Under its rules, the information is required to be kept secret for 50 years. Tybring-Gjedde has been a member of the Storting, the Norwegian parliament, since 2005. He is known for being pro-Israel and for opposing immigration policies that he thinks have been too welcoming. The lawmaker has often demanded that immigrants adjust to Norwegian society. He called Muslim headscarves an “Islamic uniform” and compared them to robes worn by members of the Ku Klux Klan. In 2006, he nominated Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Dutch-American activist, writer and politician critical of Islam, for the Nobel Peace Prize. The process of considering candidates and awarding the Nobel Peace Prize is done in Norway, in contrast to the other Nobel Prizes, which are awarded in neighboring Sweden.
A police officer from Lodi, California is being hailed as a hero after body-cam footage of her saving a man in a wheelchair from being killed by a speeding train at the last possible second was released. The northern California police officer, Erica Urrea, pulled up to train tracks on Lodi Avenue in her patrol car with quite literally not a second to spare. The body-cam footage shows her running up to the intersection where the tracks meet the road. Stuck right there in the middle of the tracks, as the train warning bells dinged and the train’s whistle bellowed a final warning to move, was a man in a wheelchair, unable to get his chair unstuck or to get out of it. Finally, Officer Urrea pulls the man out of the chair just... JUST... as the massive locomotive slams into it. The footage is legitimately insane. It gave me a jump scare. Nice work Officer Urrea. You’ve got some iron ovaries.
California is burning and apparently one of its wildfires was caused by a family’s gender reveal involving a pyrotechnic smoke device held in the El Dorado Ranch Park in Yucaipa, California. According to the San Bernardino National Forest‘s Twitter account, the wildfire now raging even harder than the need for attention possessed by the couple who started it has grown to 10,574 acres as of Monday and is just 16% contained. The CAL FIRE San Bernardino Unit took to Instagram to explain the situation and post a press release regarding the fire. CAL FIRE Law Enforcement has determined the El Dorado Fire, burning near Oak Glen in San Bernardino County, was caused by a smoke generating pyrotechnic device, used during a gender reveal party. The fire began at 10:23 a.m. on September 5th, 2020 in the El Dorado Ranch Park in Yucaipa. The fire spread from the park to the north on to Yucaipa Ridge that separates Mountain Home Village and Forest Falls from the City of Yucaipa. CAL FIRE reminds the public that with the dry conditions and critical fire weather, it doesn’t take much to start a wildfire. Those responsible for starting fires due to negligence or illegal activity can be held financially responsible and criminally responsible. Because the weather in California right now is both extremely dry and brutally hot the wildfire has been difficult to combat. CAL FIRE has said that the parties involved may be held both criminally and financially responsible for the fire. Please, forever and ever, stop doing gender reveals. They’re lame. A Facebook post will suffice. And what a way to make an announcement about a human life... doing it by burning an untold amount of wildlife to death. The couple might as well have truly committed to the bit and slaughtered 10,000 goats in celebration of whatever gender they announced like some sort of Babylonian king. Then could’ve at least fed homeless people instead of potentially making other people homeless.
No one: gender reveal parties.
Hahahahaha. I was gonna get a new tattoo but someone had the same idea I had...
That's a hard pass for me. Here's another creative signs telling people to wear face masks...
In many places, masks are mandatory, so you as well make it your own. There's a mask for every fashion and fandom, and there can also be a mask for every face. People order custom-made masks with photos of their face on them to try and achieve a realistic look. Try being the most important word.
Hahahaha. So, remember Amy Winehouse? Did you know she was a time traveler? No? I'll prove it...
That's really her as a kid. Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic while also caring for your children is a serious challenge many families are facing right now. Between homeschooling, Zoom meetings, and dividing up household and childcare tasks between your partner and other members of the family... it can all be a lot to manage. Young children who are especially energetic and excited that their parents and siblings are home all the time are not exactly a fun surprise for everyone to have to deal with on an important work call, regardless of how cute they might be. Holding up a dog to the webcam is one thing, but a screaming infant that isn't muted isn't a particularly helpful co-worker. So, when a dad decided to consult the Phile about a conflict he ran into with his one-year-old son and a remote work meeting, my moral compass was ready to deem a proper verdict.
"Am I wrong for bringing up the fact that my wife makes four times as much when explaining why I had to have my one year old son with me during a video meeting? I work for a local radio station. I’m still part time, despite basically working as many hours as the full time staff does, but I love the job and understand how competitive the entertainment field is, so I’ve never complained. Plus my wife makes good enough money where I don’t even have to work, but I still do. At my job, we have a lot of giveaways and contests coming up for the first time since the pandemic hit, so my boss wanted to have a video meeting via Zoom today at noon. Since my wife works all day, and I’m pretty much the primary caretaker of our son, I had to have him with me during the meeting. Noon is his most playful time of the day, so he’s usually very active during this time, so during my meeting he was making a lot of playful squeaks, banging toys and trying to play with my laptop when I would have him on my lap. At one point, one of my coworkers asked if it was possible to have my wife watch him during the meeting because he was distracting. I told them that she couldn’t because she was having a video meeting in the other room, and it was super important. Then a different coworker pointed out that we were in a meeting that’s super important and she should watch him for just a few minutes because it shouldn’t take too much longer. So then I said, 'sorry but my wife makes four times what I do in a year, so her job has a little bit more priority in this household.' No one said anything after that but there was an awkward energy and I knew I had crossed a line with that quip. I then offered to mute myself during the meeting so they didn’t hear him. Which was accepted in a seemingly begrudging way. Later I received an email from my boss, basically quizzing me on the meeting, and of course I aced it because I know how to multi task with a kid. Even though I proved that I knew everything, I was told that some of my co-workers don’t think I’m taking the job serious and need to do more to prove that. So am I wrong for saying what I said?" Interesting you were asked to fetch your wife to care for your son. Just because you have the ability to be flippant with your job... and you did indicate this flippancy 100% with your response... doesn't mean your co-workers have the same option. It seems like they made it politely very clear that they'd prefer to not be distracted at work a few times, and their requests were met, in the end, with you saying that the job isn't a priority enough in your world to remove this disturbance from your co-worker's days. There were several other options for you, most obviously saying, "Hey, sorry, my wife is in a very important meeting with some clients, but let me just put myself on mute," but, again, you decided to end this minor series of requests by throwing in an awkward one-two punch of "I don't get paid enough to do that" and "my personal situation doesn't allow me to remove this disturbance from your workday, deal with it." This isn't a question of flexibility with working parents. It sounds like you've been given some good leeway already, since you started the call with your kid in your arms but nobody said anything until he was repeatedly distracting. This is a question of respect for your job and your co-workers, which you did not demonstrate by what could have been a simple "sorry" and a mute. Passing the quiz is irrelevant... which, yeah, was a shitty thing of your manager to pull... the real issue here is what sort of environment you create when people are trying to work. Everyone sucks here. Them for assuming your wife should take the kid. You for thinking it's appropriate to use voice-activation rather than push-to-talk with a child beside you. Oh and then responding in a snarky manner belittling the job. So, there you have it! It was rude for his co-workers to assume his wife should take the child but it was also uncalled for to discuss her salary with his company. In general, his attitude did seem like he didn't need the job and choosing not to mute your very young child immediately during a work call is a very strange decision. Good luck, everyone! If you have a problem you want my advice on then email me at thepeverettphile@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment