Friday, April 30, 2021

Pheaturing Beverly Glenn-Copeland

 

Hey, kids, welcome to the Phile for a Friday. How are you? President Joe Biden delivered a speech to congress on Wednesday night to look back on his first 100 days in office. And as always, Twitter had a lot to say. The speech certainly contained less fire-and-brimstone drama than the past four years of presidential addresses did, but it did stretch to an hour and four minutes... pretty long for a speech of its kind. Biden told congress and the American public that the government's job is to "prove democracy still works." He covered everything from vaccination progress to tax plans. President Biden definitely didn’t think this one through. While addressing to Congress on Wednesday evening Joe Biden referred to the January 6th incident at the U.S. Capitol as the “worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.” The heated comment was part of a prepared remark released by the White House from President Biden’s speech to a Joint Session of Congress. Biden stated, “100 days since I took the oath of office, lifted my hand off our family Bible, and inherited a nation in crisis. The worst pandemic in a century. The worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.” As expected, the comments generated an immediate backlash from social media users, pointing out several national tragedies that have taken place since the Civil War including 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombing, and the multiple school shootings. 

Throughout the Trump presidency, the women of Congress wore white on political occasions to symbolize unity and call back to the Suffragette movement; save for 2018, when the color was black in honor of #MeToo and the Time’s Up campaign. But now, after 100 days of Joe Biden in office, color speckled the Capitol building during his first joint session of Congress: hues of Democratic blue, seasonal fuchsia, and floral face masks could be spotted clearly throughout the small, socially distant crowd. Though it was First Lady Jill Biden who really stole the show. From the moment Dr. Jill Biden stepped out on inauguration day in that icy blue get-up by Markarian, it was clear she’d use her new platform to exhibit some seriously show-stopping looks. Who could forget, just this month, when she shocked the world by deplaning Air Force One in black fishnets and booties? Throughout her brief time as the First Lady, Biden has flaunted mainly American designers and Wednesday night, for her husband’s joint address, was no different. The 69-year-old Biden wore a dress created by the Uruguayan immigrant designer Gabriela Hearst. The navy sheath dress was overlaid with a hand-embroidered mesh top featuring the official flowers from all 50 states, in addition to the District of Columbia and all U.S. territories. Going into detail on her website, Hearst explained that a flower from her home state of Delaware, a peach blossom, was positioned above Biden’s heart with the other 55 blooms branching out from there. And if this look seems familiar, you’re not wrong. Biden wore a white version on inauguration night when she stepped out to view celebratory fireworks from the White House. Hearst’s designs are also well-known for their sustainability; in this case, Hearst explained the recycled journey of the dress’s materials on her Instagram: “The Silk Wool dress (and mask)was made entirely of existing fabrics. Made and embroidered in New York. It was originally used to fit the inauguration one. The First Lady requested to salvage for another occasion. Double repurposed. New is not always better..” Social media lit up Wednesday night, applauding Biden’s wardrobe choice and examining the visual details. Throughout President Joe Biden’s speech, VP Kamala Harris stood resolutely beside the president. This is standard procedure, of course, but as the first woman in the role, that means Harris’ sartorial choices are under sustained scrutiny. But she impressed in a cream-colored blazer set by Prabal Gurung. Harris has certainly faced some style criticism. But for the most part as Vice President, she’s flexed the creative fashion of many black designers, including Pyer Moss, Christopher John Rogers and Sergio Hudson. (Gurung, who Harris wore Wednesday night, is Nepalese and based out of New York.) No doubt the entire Emhoff-Harris family is fashion-forward. Harris’ stepdaughter Ella Emhoff recently signed with IMG models... along with the 2021 inaugural poet Amanda Gorman. 

Last week, Fox News spread the false narrative that Democratic President Joe Biden’s climate requirements would force Americans to remove 90 percent of red meat from their diets. How the rumors of the Red Meat Consumption War Began The network’s false claims spread like wildfire on social media, causing most users... including GOP lawmakers like Texas Gov. Greg Abbot, North Carolina Rep Madison Cawthorn and Georgia rep Lauren Boebert... to become outraged. Donald Trump Jr, the former President’s son, tweeted that he was “pretty sure I ate four pounds off of red meat last yesterday. That is going to be a hard NO from me!” Fox Business host Larry Kudlow took the wild claims even further, saying that Americans would have to cut their “poultry… fish, seafood, eggs, dairy, and animal-based fats’ from their diets” with the Biden climate agenda. Fox News hosts Jesse Watters and Ainsley Earhardt also touted claims about the Democrat’s war against red meat, as did Fox Business host Larry Kudlow. The only problem was that it was fake news. New, inconvenient evidence forced top Fox stars, including senior Fox News anchor John Roberts, into an embarrassing climb down. He admitted that the network had “incorrectly implied that it was part of Biden’s plan for dealing with climate change”. CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale wrote that “Biden… has not proposed any limit on Americans’ consumption of any food. The false claim about Biden trying to restrict people to four pounds of red meat per year appears to have originated with a deceptive Thursday article by the British tabloid The Daily Mail. The article baselessly connected Biden’s climate proposals to an academic paper from 2020 that is not about Biden… that claim is complete nonsense.” President Biden and Vice-President Kamala Harris have made climate change a top priority of the new administration. But as Tom Vislack, the Biden Administration’s Secretary of Agriculture said on Monday, “There is no effort designed to limit people’s intake of beef coming out of President Biden’s White House or USDA.” The network’s confusion seems to come from the fact that an April 2020 University of Michigan study recommended a large reduction in people’s consumption of red meat in order to cut harmful greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent. While Biden’s climate plan also wants to reduce emissions at the rate 50 percent by 2030, conservative media has simply made a false connection based on a target shared by those who care about climate change around the world. 

Rudy’s been raided! Wednesday FBI agents conducted a search on former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani‘s home and office in Manhattan. The federal investigators issue a search warrant at 6 a.m. and though Giuliani has not been charged, the move signifies the bureau is increasing its criminal investigation into former president Donald Trump’s notorious attorney. Now Trump has responded on Fox News. Feds raided both Rudy Giuliani’s apartment and office, retrieving electronic devices from both NYC locations: cellphones and computers. Giuliani’s son Andrew Giuliani first appeared before the press to defend his father. Then, in a statement about the raid, Giuliani called the search a “corrupt double standard” by Justice Department which he says ignores “blatant crimes” by Democrats like President Joe Biden. Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello added, “What they did today was legal thuggery.” As The New York Times pointed out, prior to becoming mayor of New York City, Giuliani was a Republican prosector for the same U.S. attorney’s office that’s now investigating him. In that position, he had a reputation for going hard after “corrupt politicians.” So this recent FBI raid rings with a certain sort of American irony. As a close associate of Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani has been under investigation for shady business dealings in Ukraine during the election cycle of 2019 and 2020. CNN reports that federal agents are trying to determine whether Giuliani was lobbying illegally on behalf that country. Ukrainian officials. For example, Giuliani pressured Trump to fire the career diplomat Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch who was openly critical of the Trump administration. Doing so to honor the wishes of Ukrainian officials would have violated serious laws regarding the influence of foreign agents. Additionally, law enforcement is looking into Giuliani’s collaboration with Ukrainians last year to unearth dirt on the Democratic candidate’s son, Hunter Biden. In 2014, Hunter Biden had joined the board of Burisma Holdings, the largest private oil and gas extracting company in Ukraine. Giuliani also received a $500,000 payment from Ukrainian businessmen Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. Both men were indicted in 2019 during Trump’s first impeachment... over soliciting Russian interference in the 2016 election... for illegally funneling foreign capital into pro-Trump groups in America. Since then, Parnas has implicated both Trump and Giuliani in various schemes. As Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Giuliani has traded his previous reputation... as the self-appointed “America’s Mayor”... in favor of brazen backroom Ukrainian quid pro quo. But it seems, for now at least, that he remains supported by the former GOP president. In an interview with Fox Business, Trump said, “Rudy Giuliani is a great patriot. He does these things. He just loves his country. And they raid his apartment. It’s so unfair. It’s a double standard that I don’t think anyone’s seen before. It’s unfair.” Trump’s message echoes Giuliani’s directly with the distracting term: “double standard.” Now most commentators and critics alike are wondering whether Trump’s words, rather than signifying loyalty, are a blueprint for his own defense… as he wonders whether or not he’s the next FBI target. Of course, this news was overshadowed by President Joe Biden’s speech to a joint session of Congress last night marking his first 100 days in office. And that itself was overshadowed by Jill Biden’s memorable dress. 

For the first time since Trump declared the novel coronavirus pandemic a national emergency last March, Americans can safely smile, frown, and even blow air kisses (from a distance) at strangers without the shroud of a face covering... as long as both parties are in a non-crowded outdoor space. That’s according to new guidance released yesterday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “If you are fully vaccinated you can start doing many things that you had stopped doing because of the pandemic,” the new CDC guidance says. “Fully vaccinated” status is achieved two weeks after your second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or two weeks after a single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccination. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky elaborated on the development Tuesday during a White House briefing,  “If you are vaccinated, things are much safer for you.” The health official continued, elaborating on the updated mask guidelines, “If you are fully vaccinated and want to attend a small outdoor gathering... with people who are vaccinated and unvaccinated... or dine at an outdoor restaurant with friends from multiple households, the science shows you can do so safely, unmasked.” The CDC is very clear when it is (and is not) safe to not wear masks outdoors. CDC-sanctioned, safe outdoor settings include: small, outdoor gatherings with a mixture of vaccinated and unvaccinated people, outdoor restaurants with friends and members of your household, outdoor spaces when walking, running, cycling, rollerblading, flying kites, unicycling, doing the macarena, etc. The aforementioned outdoor settings are so low risk that even those without a coronavirus vaccine may participate without wearing a face mask, according to the CDC. Whether you have received a COVID-19 vaccine or not, there are certain settings where you should wear a mask, according to the CDC. The CDC recommends that both vaccinated people and unvaccinated people should continue to wear masks in the following scenarios where social distancing may be difficult: Crowded outdoor events, like concerts, sporting events, and parades, indoor settings, including barbershops and hair salons, indoor malls and museums, movie theaters, and full-capacity churches, public transportation. The CDC is relaxing mask mandates now that more than 50 percent of American adults have obtained at least one dose of the vaccine. Even before the new guidelines, public health experts have long noted the low likelihood of becoming infected with an infectious disease while outdoors. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief infectious disease expert in the U.S., has called the risk of spread in outdoor settings “minuscule.” “Virus just cannot accumulate in the air outdoors,” Linsey Marr, a researcher at Virginia Tech, told NPR. “It’s like putting a drop of dye into the ocean. If you happen to be right next to it, then maybe you’ll get a whiff of it. But it’s going to become diluted rapidly into the huge atmosphere.” President Joe Biden has hailed the relaxation of mask requirements as a way to dispel vaccine hesitancy, urging unvaccinated citizens to do so... not just to protect themselves and those around them, but so they can begin returning to normalcy by “getting together with friends, going to the park for a picnic without needing a mask.” 

It took almost 245 years for this to happen...

It’s about time. Finally, a reboot worth watching...

Hahahaha. When you were warned to take half but you wanted the full edible...

Any stroll through a store would have you believe that "pink is for girls" and "blue is for boys" are the associated gender roles are the very backbone of our society. Products from nail clippers to hand lotion are assigned genders when last time I checked, inanimate objects don't have gender identities. "I just want a bigger pocket please, is that too much to ask for? Sincerely, women everywhere."

You know what makes me chuckle? When people reenact pictures from their past... like this one...

Yes, that's me and my sisters... photo taken in 2014. The second one was. The first was way before that... 1980 or '81. Haha. It's never fun when you go above and beyond to plan a special day for your partner to celebrate an important anniversary or key relationship milestone, only to realize they completely forgot about it... Waking up when the sun rises to cook a fancy breakfast-in-bed with a trail of rose petals leading to a beautifully wrapped gift is a nice gesture, but if your partner fully forgot that today is the anniversary of your first date then things can get awkward. That being said, planning a fun day for someone you love should never be about expecting something in return, especially if it isn't a day you normally celebrate. Birthdays and wedding anniversaries are standard, but if you made up a holiday for the first day you ate pancakes on a plane together? Cut your wife some slack for the lack of pancakes and airport-themed decor... Looking back on meaningful memories in a relationship can be a fun, nostalgic way to honor the time you've spent together and the future plans you want to make, but putting pressure on your partner to put in the same exact enthusiasm and effort into important dates is a recipe for resentment and disaster. So, when a frustrated wife decided to consult the moral compass of the Phile about her husband's "vacation anniversary" celebration, I decided to help with a verdict.  

"Am I wrong for forgetting my husband and I's 'vacation anniversary?' My husband  and I have been married for four and a half years now. In the spring of 2018, we took a two-month long trip to Europe/Africa where we stayed in London, Barcelona, and Marrakesh. It was a great time for both of us and since then we've always wanted to do another long trip like that. So, this morning. My husband wakes me up at 7 a.m. with a gift. At this point, I'm a little pissed off because we had both gone to bed at 1 and I wanted to sleep in. So, I open the gift (which is an envelope), and inside are our plane tickets from our home airport to London dated on 4/29/2018. I mean... a little strange but okay? Then, he drags me into the kitchen where I see he's prepared a Spanish-style breakfast for me, which I thought was really sweet of him. He told me that since today was the day we left on our big trip and haven't been able to travel for a year, he wanted to do something special for me to commemorate. I mean, overall it was a really nice gesture even if I was sleep deprived. Our day then goes on as normal (we both work from home). Around noon I go into the kitchen to make some lunch for myself, and my husband comes in and says, 'So, I'm guessing you didn't get me anything?' At this point I'm pretty confused so I'm like, 'get you anything for what?' Then, he gets this exasperated look on his face and says, 'Our vacation anniversary?' I didn't know if this was a joke or not, because we've literally NEVER celebrated this 'vacation anniversary' before, despite it technically occurring already two times in 2019 and 2020. So, I laugh at it and tell him 'maybe next year I will.' He didn't appreciate the joke. He told me that our vacation was more 'significant than our wedding' and that it hurt him that I didn't remember. I apologized to him but he's still got a pissy attitude with me. Am I wrong?" Hmmmm. nope. This is not a yearly event you guys celebrate. You had no way of knowing he was planning to make a big deal about it this year. Can't your husband just do something sweet for you without expecting something in return? A vacation anniversary is a new one to me. Did he say why he considers your “vacation” more significant than your wedding? I mean, personally, I’ve never heard of such a thing so I don’t see how you could be wrong for not remembering to celebrate something you two have never celebrated before. Tell him that you’re “hurt” he didn’t remember for the past two years. I mean how were you supposed to magically know that THIS was the year to celebrate? You can't be in the wrong for something you didn't know was a thing. I'm also pretty bummed with your husband. That was kind of a cute thing he did... and it could have been a great day, but he had to ruin it by getting pissy with you. Ugh. You should talk with him to find out where his frustration came from and make sure there isn't something else going on that he needs help with or that you both need to work on. So, there you have it! This woman was not wrong at all to assume her husband's disappointment about their "vacation anniversary" was a joke, as it wasn't even a celebratory tradition they had established as a couple. Also, for him to say their "vacation anniversary" was more important than their wedding? You can't make up a fake holiday and then get upset that you didn't get a gift. Good luck, everyone! If you have a problem you want my help and opinion on then email me at thepeverettphile@gmail.com. 



If you spot the Mindphuck let me know. Now from the home office in Port Jefferson, New York, here is...


Top Phive Things Said At Joe Biden's Joint Session Speech
5. Biden promises to bring back McDonald's szechuan sauce.
4. Biden called America the most unique idea in the world as if he's never watched "The Babadook." 
3. Biden now lingering in the House Chamber like it's a swing state Dairy Queen.
2. Biden being boring has been more helpful to my mental health than I expected. 
And the number one thing said at Biden's Joint Session speech was...
1. Joe Biden is relentlessly on message. Too bad every normal person in the country thinks he's banning meat and giving out Kamala Harris's book to immigrant children because of a meme they saw on Facebook. 




If you or someone you know is experiencing substance abuse, call the National Drug Helpline at 1-844-289-0879. Okay, let's take a live look at Port Jefferson, shall we?


Looks like a really nice day there.


Bruce Wayne’s parents being murdered was the best thing that ever happened to Gotham.


The 150th book to be pheatued in the Phile's Book Club is...


The great Dolly Parton will be on the Phile in a few weeks.


Today's guest is an American singer and songwriter whose latest release "Transmissions" is available on iTunes, Amazon and Spotify. Please welcome to the Phile... Beverly Glenn-Copeland.


Me: Hello, Beverly, welcome to the Phile. How are you? 

Beverly: I'm doing wonderful, Jason. Thank you for having me. 

Me: So, you have a very interesting story, right? Tell the readers what happened about an email. 

Beverly: Well, one email can change your whole life. 

Me: Explain what you mean. 

Beverly: For 25 years, I performed kids' songs on "Mr. Dressup," but in my spare time, I was making my own music in relative obscurity. I released some cassettes, but estimates that I only sold about 50 to 100... that is, until something amazing happened. In 2015, my life changed when an influential record collector in Japan heard one of my old cassettes and kick-started my career. It happened as instantly as an email landing in my inbox. Now, at age 75, I was touring for the very first time and reaching a whole generation of listeners. 

Me: So, you have an album from 1986 called "Keyboard Fantasies," It must feel like a lifetime ago and you're still talking about that record, am I right? 

Beverly: It actually feels that way to be honest. But at the same time my life has sort of a path of evolvement and that part of my life was so critical even to who I am now that the connection is quite strong. 

Me: So, can I be indelicate? 

Beverly: Sure, you can be indelicate. 

Me: You sold how many of these cassettes? 

Beverly: Maybe a 100, or maybe 50. 

Me: That's more than my CD sold. Haha. Who bought these cassettes? 

Beverly: I mostly sold them to people who were your mothers, who were playing them to their children to put them to sleep. 

Me: What was your reaction when, almost three decades later, you receive an email from a Japanese record collector, asking if you had any copies of the album lying around? 

Beverly: It was out of the blue. I was like, "Okay, I do but how " He said, "Can you send me 30?" I had more than 30 so I sent him 30 and then two days later, he got back to me and said, "I've sold them all." I was like whoah, then I sent him the rest that I had. I didn't really understand the indie industry, which had developed during the time in which I was not paying any attention, because the industry could never figure out what I did. So they had no slot for me. I just didn't think about it. In all those years the indie industry was developing. What I didn't realize was that he had a website that was internationally watched. He put out what he thought what was happening. Suddenly, out of the blue, within the space of two months, I had record companies from around the world that were trying to talk to me about reissuing things. 

Me: Emotionally, what was that like? How do you deal with something like that? 

Beverly: Well, I'm a Buddhist. I've ben chanting for 48 years. What this practice has emphasized is that happiness is not based on material things. Nor is it based on even physical health. Obviously, you need those things for life, but true happiness is based on the joy of being alive. Period. So because this started happening after I've been chanting for 45 years or something the idea that this was going to make me happy was not a part of the equation. But it certainly had a sense which I'm so grateful for. If I'm supposed to in this lifetime offer music as part of what I came to do then that was happening. 

Me: Beverly, where are you from? 

Beverly: I was born in Pennsylvania but spent most of my life in Canada. 

Me: And you said you're a Buddhist? 

Beverly: Yes, I'm a member of an organization called Soka Gakkai International. It's an organization of Buddhists and it's phenomenal from my prospective. 

Me: So, you said you performed songs on something called "Mr. Dressup." What was that? 

Beverly: It was extraordinary. The best part is I got to write music for kids. It was a Canadian children's series. 

Me: That's cool. Okay, so, are the kids that watched you on "Mr. Dressup," are they going to your shows? 

Beverly: Maybe that's why I was meant to be on the "Mr. Dressup" show so the kids could be in the audience later. You never know how the universe works, Jason. 

Me: So, what are your audiences like now that you're doing shows? 

Beverly: People who are about 20s and 30s. 

Me: What do you think of that? 

Beverly: It's extraordinary actually. 

Me: Do you have any idea why this music might be connecting with this generation now? 

Beverly: Well, the things that I was talking about then are the things that the young generation is concerned with now. 

Me: Like what? 

Beverly: You're world citizens, by and large, and you have a vision of respect for all and trying to understand that other cultures may be different, but as essentially humans, we are essentially the same. And also, they're now burdened with this mess that my generation has left them, which is a world that is... dying. You have to understand, I don't think of myself as writing this music. I really think of myself as a radio that a lot of time is turning to certain frequencies that my particular self as a radio could best bring in. And I really always felt the music has been sent to me. And the kinds of lyrics that were coming through was all about that. That's what it is about. That's what I was talking about 40 years ago and now this is relevant to that generation. And I think that's why. 

Me: I read you were part of the folk scene in Toronto in the 70s, right? 

Beverly: Yeah, vaguely. Very, very vaguely. I was never a folk musician so I was never really part of the folk scene. 

Me: Ahhh, so I was wrong. 

Beverly: Well, I played the Riverboat once... 

Me: Okay, so, Beverly, when you were born were you male or female? I'm not sure how to ask that question. 

Beverly: When I was born my assigned sex was female. I knew I was male as early as three-years-old and transitioned about 20 years ago. 

Me: When you were performing then did the audiences still view you as female? Your name is Beverly after all... 

Beverly: Of course they would have. 

Me: How did that factor in to your experience? 

Beverly: If we don't have a language for something, if it's not within the language of our culture, it's very hard to figure out some things, right? So even though at three, I announced to my parents that I was a boy... the subsequent culture, that was 1947 when I announced that. There was no cultural reference for that, none whatsoever. So there was no way in the years of growing up that I could of understood because at three things just come out. Then after that I was being conditioned. Conditioned to this, conditioned to that. I was being conditioned to be female and I was always very uncomfortable with it, extremely uncomfortable with it, but I had no other thing with which to define myself. And then one day, I had something to define myself. I was lying on a beach, reading a book, it was in the mid 90s and in this particular book the memories of this person which happened to be transgendered, I was reading these memories and I thought those are MY memories. All of a sudden there was a language for me to be able to define myself. Then at that point I did. Of course they would of viewed me as female. 

Me: How did you feel then? I bet you were overwhelmed. 

Beverly: It was as though a pallor over my life had lifted. Suddenly, it was very clear to me what had been going on all those years. 

Me: How do you like being back on the road a few years ago? 

Beverly: There's two sides of being on the road. There's I'm happy to be on the road because I can say thank you to my audience. But at the same time I look at it and I laugh. Uh huh, I'm 75 and now I'm going on the road? But my team members, Indigo Rising, they are like my kids, I have all kinds of names for them... "bad bunnies," "good bunnies," but I love them. They're so protective. In fact they're so protective that I don't get a chance to lift anything, I could get even weaker. 

Me: So, do you think you're where you're meant to be? 

Beverly: I think I am exactly where I was meant to be and at exactly the right time. I'm just very happy that I lived to see it. 

Me: So, the songs were written so long ago, Beverly, can you still relate to them now? 

Beverly: I have this theory about life that is when someone is in their early 20s, and the recording was done in my 20s. This is a time of sex and development. That's a natural thing, that's exactly what's going on. Then a little bit later it's less sex and more development. So I'm definitely in that part of my life. This was a time where emotional relationships were what was occupying my mind. 

Me: You think that stops essentially? 

Beverly: Yes, I think it does. 

Me: Why is that? 

Beverly: Because the primary relationship becomes one relationship with ones self. And also ones relationship with the universe. 

Me: Hmmmm. Thanks for being on the Phile, Beverly, this was pretty unique. 

Beverly: Thanks for having me.





That about does it for this entry of the Phile. Thanks to Beverly Glenn-Copeland for an interesting interview. The Phile will be back on Monday with singer Tom Bailey... as long as my second vaccine shot goes okay. Haha. Spread the word, not the turd. Don't let snakes and alligators bite you. Bye, love you. bye. Kiss your brain!






























Give me some rope, tie me to dream, give me the hope to run out of steam, somebody said it could be here. We could be roped up, tied up, dead in a year. I can't count the reasons I should stay. One by one they all just fade away...

No comments:

Post a Comment